Evidence shows Nepalese Rulers Failure to govern the nation

It is not the BLAME GAME and also Not to point out any castes/ethnicity specifically since I don't like criticising, condemning and blaming based on any castes/ethnicity. 

However, in the case of Nepal and also in research findings we always analyze our data based on age, sex, literacy status, occupation, caste/ethnicity, religion, region, etc because these factors play key roles in the outcomes or findings.

So, in the context of Nepal since there is a conflict going on among different groups based on their castes/ethnicity so I thought why NOT look back to date who have ruled our nation. 
Looking at the background of Past rulers from 1799 to 2012 A.D. almost all of the rulers were from so-called higher castes Chhetri and Brahman.

Since 1799 AD to date (2012) in 213 years period rulers (PMs and Kings) of Nepal were total 36 people of them who became rulers for 66 times they ruled the nation. Among those 36 rulers who ruled the nation 66 times [1]:

- Chhetri (Thapa, Pande, Rana/Kunwar, Deuba, Chand, Shah, Bista, Chautaria) ruled 42 times;

- Brahman (Koirala, Bhattarai, Dahal, Adhikari, Nepal, Khanal) ruled 23 times; and

- Janajati (Shrestha) ruled 1 time.

These all have proven that Nepal Indian sage manu made upper caste (so-called higher caste) rulers are the MOST failure person in ruling the nation.

I don't know the truth BUT after 1990 to 2012 Brahmin ruled (became a PM) 12 times and Chhetri 9 times.

So, it seems that Chhetri are much better rulers compared to Brahmin in the case of Nepal as history shows since Brahmin are suppose to be a priest and teacher as per their holy scriptures rather than rulers but they have shifted their task. Thus proved to be a failure surname to rule the nation.

As per the history of Nepal first Chhetri had ruled and Brahmin became their advisors and after 2007 BS mostly Brahmin as well as Chhetri (King) ruled the Nation. But Brahmin were always advisors of King and Chhetri.

So, this has also proven that Brahmin are one of the MOST failure in ruling any political parties and the nation since they are NOT born to rule physically but to fool and bull over innocent and ignorant mass as per the history of Nepal illustrate.

What to you think guys as a FREE THINKER and independent citizen of Nepal without having any prejudice in your mindset!

Please Correct me if I'm wrong in making my analysis with limited knowledge about Nepal and Nepali. Thank you!

I shared this posting on my facebook page and people comments as follows:


Hemant Mainali (UK): Bahun can not stick to rule book. They Mend it as they please. This has happened even on religious matter. Neither the bahun are visionary,very short sighted. That's my opinion.
Thursday at 09:05 via mobile · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: If Nepalese so-called higher castes wanted caste system in Nepal can be abolished in practice since officially it has been abolished in 1962 but it seems that they don't want to do so. 

Priests are the one who are holding this caste system that can be easily abolished if priests and politicians sit and come up in decision to do so since all priests are Brahman who created and promoted casteism and almost all major political parties leaders are Brahman. What do you say Bashu Dev Lohanii bro, Hemant Mainali bro, Yam B Chand sir and Bhim Barma sir?

Thursday at 10:22 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Instead of saying Bahun/Chhetri why NOT have Khas since Khas is an ethnicity it is not a caste as far as I understand and I think Khas include Bahun/Chhetri, Sanyashi and Dalit as well

Thursday at 10:24 · Like · 1

Hemant Mainali: There are a lot of things that can be done by proper research & policy making. We should not exploit any vacuum of social injustice instead educate & guide public to humane way. As per khas I am not very aware but parbate is for pahadi bahun chhetri. The khas is for far western identity & culture including kumaoun India.

Thursday at 10:27 via mobile · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Whoever rule the nation doesn't matter but there should be JUSTICE, PROSPERITY and FREEDOM which is not happening since last 213 years as history and past show. I'm not supporting any Janajati and I'm a FREE THINKER and JUSTICE, FREEDOM, PEACE and PROSPERITY SEEKER and want to see Nepal as one of the richest and prosperous nation in the world in coming 15-20 years before I die!

Thursday at 10:42 · Like

Hemant Mainali: I support janjati as much as janjati themselves. I believe I am free thinker not supporting any party or religion caste system. However janjatti should be able to judge and have a proper look into matter of current crisis. They should not play into hands of any party if they want to establish themselves as equal to bahun chhetri and promote their identity through federalism. So far this federalism and janjatti issues have been exploited by current government. Baburam should tell clearly how & what happened and their intention to find solution to the nation.

Thursday at 10:50 via mobile · Like

Binod Rai: Janajati just blame leaders for not doing good but they never felt that how hard it is to lead the nation and to be a leader.janajati are full of egostic people who always wants to lead and think themselves better.the major problem in janajati iv seen is that they are scatter in several political partys carrying their own ideologies and thoughts.janajati should unite and should take the step very seriously.if they fail this time than they will never get another oppourtunity like this...

Thursday at 11:55 via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Hehehehe! Binod Rai ji your mindset is corrupt since you might think in that way since to date none of the Janajati being a nature lover and born in the nature had never ever thought and acted upon to lead the nation because they know very well that they are not born to lead anyone but give up and suffer and live on as per the natural gifted freedom because Living for Others is the Rule of Nature!! 

If we believe that our RELIGION is based on the RULE of Nature then we must understand that:

Nothing in nature lives for itself

Rivers don’t drink their own water

Trees don’t eat their own fruit

Sun doesn't give heat for itself

Flowers don’t spread fragrance for themselves....

So, we human beings have to help and support others rather than being a selfish and greedy always thinking about SELF and own kids and families if we believe that we respect and follow the RULE of Nature!

Thursday at 12:29 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha (Australia): Hemant Mainali ji, I also could say I was not a Newar because my ancestors were recorded to have immigrated from India. Since we have integrated into one culture, one language, and one heritage despite we are different; we are now Newar. Likewise, the same applies with Khas peoples whether or not they were indigeous of western Nepal, Kumaon region or immigrants as they share the same language, culture and the heritage.

Thursday at 13:28 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Hehehe! Dravin Bahadur Shrestha bro if you are not Newar then was is your ethnicity ni despite you are migrated from Nepal and we Tamang also migrated from Tibet or China not quite sure. In Nepal, I think everyone is migrated from else

Thursday at 13:25 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: I reckon you forgot to read this line Laxmi dd.  "Since we have integrated into one culture, one language, and one heritage despite we are different; we are now Newar"

Thursday at 13:27 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: I read it but wonder who was your ancestor ni. Indian Brahmin ho ki chhetri ho ki, etc ke ho banya

Thursday at 13:28 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Yes, Indian Brahman immigrated along with Licchavis. We are Acharyas and our kin still practices it. But I don't.

Thursday at 13:30 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Okay! But can't you guys write Brahman if know the history then just asking hai!

Thursday at 13:30 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: We are called Achaju in our neighborhood which means Acharya in Sanskrit. But, our purohits are Rojopadhyaya as they are even higher than us due to their level of practicing priesthood.

Thursday at 13:40 · Edited · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Okay! then why write Shrestha ni ta just am curious to know because we can correct the mistake if known the truth ni. Hoina ra!!

Thursday at 13:33 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: My father wanted to correct it but CDO office didnot allow it to change it as the surname in the citizenship already been recorded as Shrestha, which was changed by my grandfather as he already quit practicing it.

Thursday at 13:36 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Okay! Interesting!! But your kids can do so! My brother changed their surname from Tamang to Bomzan

Thursday at 13:38 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: But the good part in Newa: society is we don't look down on others. All treated equally in the neighbourhood.

Thursday at 13:40 · Like · 1

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट (Bashu Dev Lohani from USA): Dravin Bahadur Shrestha ji, from my observation growing up in Kathmandu, Newahs do not look down on others(ethnic groups) but they do look down upon their own people because of existing caste system. A Maharjan friend of mine tried to marry a Shahi girl and there was a huge fiasco, eventually the Guthi divided and the marriage took place. I found the deep rooted caste system in the Newa: community.

Thursday at 13:52 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Sadly deep rooted caste system in Newar family is the gift of Jayasthiti Malla. You are right Bashu Dev Lohani ji my friends who are Maharjan feel discriminated from upper caste of Newar

Thursday at 13:53 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: I do agree with you Shaswat jee, this is totally insane. But, in neighbourhood, during community work everyone takes part equally and contributes as much as they can unlike in the Khas community where their own people are treated like animals.

Thursday at 14:02 · Like · 1

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Yes, Newahs are not as miser as Bahuns and their caste system is within themselves.

Bahunbaad in Newah and Madheshi community is more of a social problem where as Bahunbaad among the Hill people is a political problem, because they were politically instituted after the formation of modern Nepal and affects people of other ethnic group.

Thursday at 14:07 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: WHY caste system doesn't want to abolish by Bahun in Nepal? WHY they love to hook up despite they know it is shameful to give own identity as a higher caste, especially in the international world I suppose. Don't you think so? or Bahun doesn't feel shame to identify as a higher caste?

Thursday at 14:14 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: What about Jayasthiti Mallas practice of institutionalising caste system? Newars have not been changed. So it's not a political problem and you can't esacape saying that. It's the individual who brag about themselves as they are supreme of the rest. Even you are not referring to yourself as Khas. Am I right?

Thursday at 14:09 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Indeed! It is not just a POLITICAL problem it is a POWER related issue ho among hill brahman

Thursday at 14:10 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: What about Jayasthiti Mallas practice of institutionalising caste system? The so called high class Newars could have been more aggressive discriminating others but this never happened. They have not been changed. So it's not a political problem and you can't esacape saying that. It's the individual who brag about themselves as they are supreme of the rest. Even you are not referring to yourself as Khas. Am I right?

You call your own fellow people dalit which itself means so called low caste or untouchable. I see no difference in calling someone a dalit or achhut. They both the same and the people still are reluctant to correct this unaccetable word throw out of the language of constitution. And how do we see the changes?

Thursday at 14:28 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: I always say achhut to refer to the so called dalit. Dalits are everyone who is oppressed, the problem of untouchables can't be euphemised as dalit. When I say political, it is definitely power related. Political problems must be solved first, then social. I am not talking about escaping from the problem.

Thursday at 14:29 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Even after 50 years or over Nepal and India caste system related issue never ever going to solve because our so-called higher castes people don't want to be an EQUAL I suppose

Thursday at 14:32 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: So who is oppressed? Me? Them? Us? C'mmon mate. They are khas underprivileged peoples as we alo have some underprivileged in our Newar community too. Please don't twist it around.

Thursday at 14:34 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Hehehehe! Our higher caste people always like to twist and manipulate the situation and words. I love that bai since it is an innate character of them if I understood reading the history and some veda and holy scriptuers verses and hymms

Thursday at 14:37 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Women are oppressed, your ethnic group is oppressed, Madheshis are oppressed, poor are oppressed and many others are oppressed. But the oppression the so called dalits face is untouchability and social outcast which is worst of all, so the word dalit is not strong enough to label the group of people who face the problem of untouchability and social outcast. That is all I am saying.

Thursday at 14:41 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Dalit faced triple oppression in India and Nepal but they LOVE to face it since they are the gift of Brahma ho ni their god! Isn't that cool God who made them to be oppressed and served their higher castes brothers and sisters!

Thursday at 14:44 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: So are all we Dalits? Is that what you want to say?

Thursday at 14:43 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Apart from Bahun/Chhetri others are DALIT by products of Bahun who married with other castes!

Thursday at 14:44 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: दलित हैन अछुत भन्नु पर्छ, सोशण जे हो त्यसैलाई त्यै शब्द ले जनाउनु पर्छ। दलनमा परेका दलित त नेपालमा धेरै छन्, तर दमाइ कामी सार्की पोडे डोम मुसहर हरूले जुन समस्या भोगेका छन् त्यो छुवाछुत र सामाजिक बहिस्कारको हो, त्यसैले दलित भनिएका समूहलाई दलित हैन अछुत भनिनुपर्दछ, किनकी त्यहि नै यथार्थ हो, दलित शब्दले यो शोशणको मर्मलाई समेट्दैन।

Thursday at 14:44 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: They are Khas peoples as you are. Why do you deliberatley marginalize them? Why do you deliberately outcast them?

Thursday at 14:45 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Bahun doesn't like to claim an identify themselves as a Khas because Khas include all Bahun/Chhetri and Dalit so if Bahun claim Khas they think that they are lower caste

Thursday at 14:46 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: What do you mean 'you deliberately marginalize them'? I am fighting against the caste system.

Thursday at 14:46 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: "दलित हैन अछुत भन्नु पर्छ, सोशण जे हो त्यसैलाई त्यै शब्द ले जनाउनु पर्छ।"

Thursday at 14:47 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: नेपालमा बाहुन छेत्री कामी दमाइ सार्की एउटै जाति(खस-आर्य)भित्रका बिभिन्न जातहरू हुन्,यिनीहरूको मात्रिभाषा पनि एउटै छ, धर्म पनि एउटै मान्दछन्, र इतिहास पनि एउटै हो। तर जनगणना गर्दा यिनीहरूलाई एउटै जातिको अन्तर्गत नराखिकन छुट्टा छुट्ट्टै कित्तमा राखेर पो गणना गरिदो रहेछ, मानौ की यिनीहरू मगर, नेवा:, गुरुङ आदि जस्तै छुट्टा छुट्टै जातिका हुन्।

यसरी एउटै जाति भित्रको जनसंख्यालाई पनि पारिवारिक प्रिस्टभूमीको आधारमा कोहि बाहुन, कोहि छेत्री, कोहि कामी आदि भनेर बर्गिक्रित गर्नाले जन्मैको आधारमा कोहि बाहुन(उपल्लो जात), कोहि छेत्री(तल्लो जात) र कोहि अछुत शुद्र(दमै, कामी, सार्की)हुन्छ भन्ने हाम्रो कुपरम्पराअलाई मन्यता दिएको ठहर्छ। राज्यसत्ताले यसरी जातको आधारमा जनगणना गरेर हाम्रो समाजमा सामजिक कलंक को रूपमा रहेको जातप्रथा/अछुतप्रथालाई प्रस्रय दिन खोजेको प्रस्ट हुन्छ। हाम्रो बर्तमान राज्यसत्ता कति सम्म बाहुनबादी छ भन्ने कुराको ज्वलन्त उदाहरण हो यो।

यदि यस्तै अवस्था रहि रहने हो भने नेपालबाट अछुतप्रथा अर्को १०० बर्षमा पनि हट्दैन। फलत: हाम्रो समाज बिभजित नै रहि रहन्छ, असमानता रहि नै रहन्छ। जब समाजमा असमानता रहन्छ तब त्यहा न्याय हुदैन, न्याय नभैकन शान्ति पनि हुदैन। कलह नै कलहमा अल्झिरहनु पर्ने कठ्ठै हाम्रो नेपालको समाज!!

शाब्दिक अर्थमा भन्नु पर्दा जस्तो सुकै दलनमा परेका हरूलाई दलित भन्न मिल्छ, चाहे त्यो महिला होस्, या मधेशि, या अन्य कोहि गरीब कमारो कमारी, तर नेपालमा ‘दलित’ भनिएका हरु त छुवाछुतबात पिडित भएका छन्, त्यसैले यो समुदाएलाई जनाउदा म दलित हैन, अछुत नै भन्ने गर्दछु, ताकी यो शब्द प्रयोग गर्दा हरेक पल्ट याद आओस्, की कस्तो घिनलाग्दो प्रथा हो यो भन्ने कुरो, र यस्तो प्रथालाई पालिराख्ने कस्ता घिन्लाग्दो मानसिकताको छ हाम्रो नेपालि समाज र हामि नेपालिहरू।

बाहुनबादको बिरुद्धमा अब नेपालमा तुफान ल्याउनुपर्छ, जबसम्म जातप्रथा हत्डैन छुवाछुत रहि नै रहन्छ,तसर्थ अबको बैचारिक लडाईं भनेको जातप्रथा तथा त्यसलाई प्रस्रय दिने मुल दर्शन सँग नै हुनेछ। नेपालि समाजका अछुतलाई ‘आर्य’ को लेबल भिडाएर त यो समस्या टसको मस हुदैन, अबको केही बर्ष नेपालि बैचारिक समाजको हड्डिमा गाढिएर रहेका बीचार मूल्य मान्यता हरूलाई चिरफार गरेरै बिताउनुपर्छ।

http://shashwatinstinct.com/state-institutionalized-caste-system-nepal/

"नेपालको सरकारी नितिले जातप्रथा लाई सघाउ पुर्याइरहेको ज्वलन्त उदाहरण!"

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Underprivileged would be the appropriate word for the deprived peoples. Since the dictionary meaning of dalit is untouchables or lower castes, it will not be acceptable anymore to label someone with this name. Losing the rights not to use mother tongue officially does not necessarily make me a Dalit. Does it?
Thursday at 14:59  · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: A poor bahun is underprivileged, but he is not untouchable and socially outcast, a poor Tamang is underprivileged but he is not untouchable and socially outcast as a 'dalit', but a damai, in addition to being underprivileged is also socially outcast and untouchable, his problem is different and severe than any other underprivileged people, his problem is untouchability, and so the problem should be labelled as what is unique about the problem.
Thursday at 15:01 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Yes, but that's what Bahun and Dalit wanted Bashu Dev Lohani ji
Thursday at 15:01 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: This is our problem not theirs. Our constitution must abolish such terminologies which still encourage to demarcate and constantly violate the human rights.
Thursday at 15:02 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Why do you bring up the term bahuns all the time? Do I call myself bahun? See the difference. This is your problem.
Thursday at 15:04 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: But as I said Dravin Bahadur Shrestha bro Bahun leaders and priests including scholars don't want to lose their supremacy feelings and thoughts because they don't want them to see at the level of EQUAL ni
Thursday at 15:05 · Like · 1

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Just because I don't bring a term does not mean that it does not exist. I bring it up because it exists. Who do you think restrict others from entering the temple citing caste? Bahuns. Who do you think enforce caste system in our society? Bahuns. Therefore I use the term.
Thursday at 15:07 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: What we can do to help them out? Set a special reservation for them for certain period of time who are accute underprivileged and to those who are mild underprivileged. We will see the diffrence dramatically.
Thursday at 15:07 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Reservation will not help, they need political power.
Thursday at 15:08 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: It exists because we don't want to abolish it despite it is unconstitutional and why we cant get rid of it because our constitution has a loophole.  Ok that would be great.
Thursday at 15:09 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Legally it was abolished long time ago, but socially it still exists because the bahuns enforce it, what loophole have you found in the constitution?
Thursday at 15:10  · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Dravin Bahadur Shrestha bro reservation is not the longer term solution. The longer term solution is to abolish caste system for the MINDSET of people first then automatically it will disappear from the society BUT priests, scholars and politicians and government don't want that. I came to know from Far and midwestern people the quota of far and mid western are taking by higher castes people who are living in Nepalgunj and Kathmandu teaching their kids, Not the real needy rural people
Thursday at 15:11 · Like · 2

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: What is wrongly addressed in the interim constitution of Nepal 2007?

There is an ambiguity and is a misleading while addressing the equality in our constitution which is as follows - "Everyone is equal, and there must be no discrimination just because a person is of a certain sex, or ethnic group or caste, or speaks a certain language or believes in a certain religion." A SIMPLE GUIDE TO THE INTERIM CONSTITUTION OF NEPAL 2007, Interim Constitution 2007 AD.

"Ethnic group or caste!?"

What is this? Why the constitution is not yet clear about an ethnic group and a caste? It means that the constitution of Nepal still believes in erroneous hindu vedic varnashram or the caste based classification. The constitution is notably ambiguous about ethnic group and caste. As we all know that ethnic group and caste are two distinct terms, why the hell this constitution uses such erroneous term "caste"?. Doesn't it likely to tell us clearly that Newa:, Tamang, Gurung, Kirat, Limbu, Sherpa are castes as Brahmans and Chettris? Actually, the Khas people do not refer themselves to "Khas" which is an ethnic group is in fact, so called Brahmin, Chhetriyas, Dashnami, Thakuris, and so called Dalits belong to it. - http://khas-people.blogspot.com.au/

Please look at Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007, Preamble 13. Right to equality

(1) All citizens shall be equal before the law. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.

(2) There shall be no discrimination against any citizen in the application of general laws on grounds of religion, race, gender, caste, tribe, origin, language or ideological conviction or any of these.

Again, on one hand it says "all citizens shall be equal before the law. No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.", on the other hand, it says "There shall be no discrimination against any citizen in the application of general laws on grounds of religion, race, gender, caste, tribe, origin, language or ideological conviction or any of these."

Caste? Why not ethnic group? It's because so called Brahmin, Chhetriyas do not refer "Khas" to themselves.
Thursday at 15:17 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: There is a feeling of SHAME among Brahman ke bro! Nothing more than that hau! SHAME and FEAR and loosing POWER and STATUS is the main issue among Bahun priests, scholars and rulers ho
Thursday at 15:18 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: I am shocked to learn more about these prepetrators. Shame!
Thursday at 15:19 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: There are 5 things people run for Name, FAME, POWER, MONEY and SEX. There are 2 things FEAR of Shame and LOOSING about above 5 things!
Thursday at 15:21 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट Dravin Bahadur Shrestha ji, the constitution should mention caste because caste system exists in our society, it is a problem and there fore we can't ignore it. The caste system in not just within one ethnic group, there are untouchables in Madheshis as well, so whether the bahuns consider themselves as khas or not has nothing to do with solving caste problem. Think of a situation, if someone is barred from entering into a temple based on caste, and how would the culprit be trialed if there is no mention of caste in the constitution?
Thursday at 15:23  · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Bashu Dev Lohani ji BUT if priests WANTED they can abolish caste system in Nepalese society ke please believe me since Priests are the super ideas giver and rulers of Nepalese society ke
Thursday at 15:24 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Sashwot instinct ji, Please do not try to defend faulty mechanism. We need a bold person unlike you, I am sorry, to step up say loudly that our constitution is erroneous. Never ever blame on the society. It's nothing to do with society it's an individual who builds it either good or bad.
Thursday at 15:25 · Like · 1

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Of course, if they wanted they can, I am saying this all along, they don't want, therefore we have to step up.
Thursday at 15:25 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Who makes them follow it? It's us based on the constitution and law.
Thursday at 15:26 · Like · 1

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: So if the constitution does not mention caste, then how will it help fighting against the caste problem?
Thursday at 15:27 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Let's amend it first and you will witness it by yourself. Law and power sharing as you mentioned earlier. A fair proportion of power sharing mechanism should be implemented. Top of that the guaranteed and constant economic growth and socio-economic development are the factors contribute the continuity of law and order.
Thursday at 15:33 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट :So the US constitution says there should be no discrimination against race, does that mean the US constitution approves race? If they find a case of racism, then the culprit will be trialed as per the laws made against racism. If there were no mention of race in the constitution, then there would be no laws made against racism, then if a restaurant does not let a person in because the person is black then how would the restaurant be punished?
Thursday at 15:33 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: In Nepal's case, the caste is deliberately put in the constitution. Racism is pandemic. In American constitution we don't see White, Black, Latinas. Do you?
Thursday at 15:37 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Hehehehe! I love the two higher caste (Bahun) brothers discussion since One is opposing and protecting to keep it as it exists in society covertly and another one is trying to eliminate from the society the caste system
Thursday at 15:49 ·  Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Dravin Bahadur Shrestha ji, Do you see Damai, Pode, Chyame, Dom, Musahar in our constitution?
Thursday at 17:22 · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Sahowt instinct ji, Why are you making a fool of yourself? Damai is Khas but look what they have done to Damai? They are labelled a Dalits which is in fact an untochable caste. If they refer to themselves as Khas, there would not have been caste mentioned in the constitution. That would have been ethnic group. 

For your kind information Pode and Chyames are Newars not Dalits. Please don't mix up.

Actually, In newar, we don't call Chyame. It's the khas peoples who call them such. They are Chyamha: Khala: which mean Eight clans or groups. There is another family or clan who are called Dyola:, resides in main temple. They interact with everyone, resides in temple, touch each other, a perfect picture of social harmony.
Thursday at 17:54 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: It seems that Dravin Bahadur Shrestha bro being a Bahun enjoying belonging to a Newah I suppose since you support the fact about Newah rather than being Acharya like our Bashu Dev Lohani bro! 

Thursday at 17:57 · Like · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: I am not brahman anymore Laxmi dd.
Thursday at 17:57 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: Just coz you enlist Damai under Khas(which I would like to see as I have mentioned above), untouchability does not cease to exist. There are untouchables in Madhesh, what ethnic group would you want them to enlist under? And if there will be a caste based discrimination, how would you punish the culprit if you omit punishment against caste based discrimination from the constitution by not metioning it in the constitution?
Thursday at 18:13 via mobile · Like

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: So you think it is alright to leave it like that? Constitution is the law made by the people for the people. If it has a loophole in it how do we gurantee that we overcome such problem? Law enforcement and severe punishment only overcome such problems. Lets enforce it from today and amend the bloody faulty constitution.
Thursday at 18:17 · Like

शाश्वत इन्स्टिंक्ट: I am for making stronger law and giving all power to the people. Under federalism that I am envisioning, local people will have the most power, making and enforcing laws will be easier and quicker, so whatever mechanism needed to eradicate untouchability, it will be formed locally via direct democracy.
Thursday at 18:34 via mobile · Llike · 1

Dravin Bahadur Shrestha: Lets hope shaswat jee.
Thursday at 18:35 · Like · 1

Yam B Chand (Canada): Laxmiji, FYI, from the first line of Nepali PMs, Shah, Chand, Rana and Bista are not Chhetris, Bista (Kirtinidhi Bista) is a Bahun, Chautaria is not a caste but a Position, which was only given to siblings of the King and rest Shah, Rana and Chand are Thakuris. In Nepal there is a difference between Thakuri and Chhetri. So, Chhetri PMs were Thapa, Pande and Deuba only. I don't blame you, as you might have copy pasted the above info.
Friday at 09:19 · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Thank you Yam B Chand sir for clarifying about the castes of the past rulers. Hehehe! I didn't copy and past I just analysed it from the given above link. Regarding Bista is it Bahun because in my home town Bista we've Chhetri and about Thakuri where do they fall in varna system that we've 4 i.e. Brahman, Chhetri, Vaisna and Sudra. I thought that Thakuri fall under 2nd group so classified based on that since they are definately not in the 1st group as per the Muluki Ain as well. Please correct me if I'm misunderstood.
Friday at 09:34 · Like

Yam B Chand: No problem Laxmiji,You r right most of Bistas we find in Nepal are Chhetris, but our former PM KN Bista is a Bahun, as such he writes Nidhi as his middle name, mostly used by Bahuns. As for Thakuris (only in Nepal), Jungbahadur Rana while taking Rana title wanted to make sure thatThakuris must be something special, so the practice was to write (as per social echelon of Tagadharis like, Bahun (Upadhdhaya), Thakuri(Rajput), Bahun (Jaisi), Chhetri, Newar Bahun, Indian Bahun, Sanyasi and various Newar castes... as per his First Civil Code of 1854. This was more or less practice even in Indian small Kingdoms ruled by Hindu Royals under British.
Friday at 09:37 · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Yeah! I also came to know about that complex caste system in Nepal introduced by Jayasthiti Malla. By the way, I came to know that Rana is Kunwar Chhetri so how come they became Thakuri ni pheri so complicated to understand. If Nepali so-called higher castes don't abolsihed caste system practice in our society Nepal sociopolitical issues never ever going to solve even after 100 years I suppose. If so-called higher cases wanted they can but they don't want sadly to abolish it. Unfortunate of Nepal mum! 

Reference

1. Liste of past rulers of Nepal accessed from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Prime_Ministers_of_Nepal

A youth view about Nepali society and people!!

Today I had a wonderful chatting with a guy who inboxed me below information regarding Nepalese people and their social work and religion promotion.

"Did you know that so many men are advertising about building temple, promoting religion (hinduism and buddism) in western countries, promoting Mt. everest is in Nepal and Buddha was born in Nepal. But not once they have expressed the feeling about the people, women, children, crime that has been happening at home(Nepal). One prime example is Prem Guragain who is in America and wants his name to be published as a history changer. He has no sympathy about the crimes. our Ministers they are just rag-doll, they turn where ever the money and popularity is...........!!

I salute lady like you who comes back home and tries to make difference at home. What is happening today in our country is absolutely unbearable. I can't send my teen sister out on the road without worrying until she comes home.

Rapist are priest, coaches, fathers, brothers, boss.........

I heard, there are so many incidents in developed country in Nepali families. Between Nepali to Nepali each other are unfair, they take sides, most of the time incidents are hidden, if women try to take action against violation, other Nepali who are so called popular try to keep it secret or help predators more than victim. Have you hear of Ajay Dev?

And there is a person Tej Raj Paudel, who lives in USA California had been abusing many young girls and his own wife for many years. His wife couldn't take anymore when he sexually assaulted his own daughter. His wife didn't attend the court (didn't want him to be persecuted) is among everyone in LA and freely partying. The women (mother/wife) protected the daughter, but failed to follow through court dates and kept him outside not in jail. These kind of secrecy need to come out and victims needs to be supported.

It is odd for me to understand even though how a man can rape, abuse and kill woman. Each man are raised and loved by a woman. I am already assertively talking to groups of men about respecting women and supporting victims of each house. bless your heart for working so hard and working for others.


I like your post about penis rules. I realized but you posted, that opened many men's eyes. We've so many disgusting people......I also tell my parents and sisters: not to go to temple and get tika from disgusting prist
I have seen their eyes twinkle when they put tika over young girl's forehead.
specially in Nepal .........BHATE CHOOR PANDIT and NAME KO LAGI KAM GARNE are the worst." 

After having some discusion the above remarks I requested him to introduce himsel. Then he said:  

"I am very simple person, just have lots of respect to pure and hardworking people, and want the society to change positively. I was born and raised in Chitwan, have just college education. My dad died when I was 10, mother raised alone, suffered injustice in the society. As a 10 year old, I became the head of household and started to become breadwinner. I learned to live and protect women, and children and and men in need by experiences. I educate myself by reading books, blogs, news.

I have suffered enough from society, from so called head of the community, unfaithful police and above. I strive the change.......the change that Nepal can experience.
We introduce ourself as having Everest. That is not really true height of ours, we say Buddha was born in our country...so???? we are not at peace! 
there are so many girls being sexually abused by their won father, brother, mama, grand father. the girl will be sent away to hide those men's shame and the girl suffers forever or they kill her. 
I have not gone to university to get much education, neither have degree or reputable job. I am a labourer, earn just enough to eat. I don't have worry about my future, I will die the way 90% poor Nepalese die. But I want everyone to die with dignity not being a victim.
What else can I say!!!"

Wine, Casteism, Fearism, Religion and Spirituality!!!

Today I had a wonderful and very productive discussion in the facebook group named "Open Discussion about Federalism" that has 6,649 members. Immediately I posted below statement with the Plato's quote in the group then discussion started by Mr. Hemant Mainali from UK.

The reason WHY I love wine drinkers and kids!! :)

“There is truth in wine and children”
― Plato

Discussions: 

Hemant Mainali (UK): They are both guided by their ego of winning and being superior. If they keep it to learning & educating in fair means they shall have some success.
about an hour ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Hemant Mainali: Like a car Ho hai. Correction.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Mitra Pariyar (PhD scholar from Sydney: Now there's a little inversion: Bahuns are the most drinkers, and yet claim higher status-sillly!
4 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Higher or lower castes as per the Manusmriti doesn't differentiate based on whether or not people drinks. Someone has to born to be a higher castes in that caste
4 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand (Canada): Laxmiji, Have you read Manusriti? Manusmriti allows marriage between Bramin man to all 4 caste women and also a Shudra to all 4 caste women, all legally. Their caste wouldn't have any problem, but children born will have a different castes. Men who marry outside caste wouldn't be deprived of their social priviledges. But in Nepal the Bahuns who made Code for Nepalis introduced death penalty for having sex by lower caste men to upper cate women, which was a kind of Taliban type Hinduism, just to control all masses by Ranas and Bahuns.
4 hours ago · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: Ho ya, Yam B Chand sir I love Manusmriti becuase it has completely opened my blocked eyes and mind, which I didn't know about it.

But had heard about it. I've to thank Rameshwori Pant dd for quoting two verses from the Manusmriti while she wrote the article titled "Manusmrit Ko Bato Ma Haro Samaj" published in Kantipur.
3 hours ago · Like

Mitra Pariyar: Its no that rigid. you can lose your caste by marrying with someone non-Tamang, hoina...part of the reason why Bahun women are most suppressed, anthros say, is because they are wary of women interbreeding and diluting their caste. so, partly, caste is acquired as well...
Laxmi ji, have u read these on caste: Dumont (Homo Hierarchicus), MN Srinivas (invented the term Sanskritization), Fuller, Gopal Guru (JNU Dalit professor), etc
4 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Yam B Chand: But Mitraji, Tamangs claim they have caste system. It is only us, hindus who have this stinking system and culture
4 hours ago via mobile · Like

Hemant Mainali: Laxmi ji, though I respect your views against manusmriti and discrimination related. We should not go against the book of manusmriti but against those who still practice the rules which is completely irrelevant and inhumane these days. As I have discussed some issues with my group of people. They say that the manusmriti no matter how bad it looks now. But it also sets some marale value of our culture and set of rules to last our genes for thousand of years. Whoever wrote it was not intently trying to discriminate the women and lower caste people. Knowledge only matters till the day a new greater knowledge comes to light. That does not mean it was all bad but a source of new knowledge. Like a at is so beneficial but same time it's smoke causing a greater harm. As told my some knowledge people of our faith.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

Mitra Pariyar: in a way, Hemant ji is right. Muslims are seen as conservative as mny of them try to follow the Prophet word for word. If Christians believe fully in bible, how could jesus be born without a fertilizing man? most ancient texts are irrelevant now, aren't they?
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Yam B Chand: Hemantji, I don't claim to have full texts of Manusmriti, but from what I have able to read so far, I am convinced that this book has been misinterpreted first our priests and secondly people who introduced First Civil Code of Nepal so badly that no one knows exactly what Manu wrote for Manav Jaati.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu (Canada): I guess Manu was leader of the community those days and he use to make mistakes due to his selfishness and he has to cover himself from his misbehavior so everything bad or good he made the law from the God. There are many religious prophets they did same thing .
3 hours ago · Like · 2

Yam B Chand: Sorry Mitraji, I wanted to say Tamangs claim they have no caste system.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Mitra Pariyar ji that's why I told you before you will be upgraded to higher caste once you complete your PhD. I'm not saying in my own but after reading an article titled "Hindu Samaj Ma Dalit Mukti Ko Prasana" written by Bishnu Bhakta Dulal (Aahuti) published in a book titled "Nepalma Varnabyabastaa ra Barga Sangharsha" by Samata Foundation, Lalitpur 2010 I knew it. Here you go of the 6 points mentioned by author about WHY Sudras are Silent despite 3000 years old caste based discrimination interestingly he pointed out that "The Brahmin and the Chhetri rulers carried on with the tricky ploy of inclusion of talented and courageous Sudras and Vaishyas in Brahman and Chhetri Varnas so that the Sudra and Vaishyas may remain leaderless and hence not united."
3 hours ago · Like 1

Hemant Mainali: Yes I agree with you laxmi ji, To my knowledge a Brahman is a teacher and knowledgeable person. Who conducts himself to educate others and teaches people. Still if you study Sanskrit no matter which you caste you belong you can become acharya.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Dalit community highly educated and talent people are so lucky because their caste can be upgraded .
3 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand: Again Tenzingji, I think you need to study about Manu before you make any such claim. It is the people who misinterpreted Hindu system in his name, to blame. I have found his version of Hinduism plain and simple, where a Shudra can marry legally a Brahman woman without suffering any social repurcissions, but his son's caste would now become Chandal, who burns and manages dead-bodies, similarly if a Brahman takes kshatriya woman, son would become a Kayastha, if marries a vaisya woman, son would be Kansakar, etc. etc., but unlike Jungbahadur's Code wouldn't lose caste (Brahman) or his head (Sudra). It is very intresting to study a real Manusmriti.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Hemant Mainali: Our Nepali people suffered not because of Hinduism of ancient time. But rule of the country which belonged to ancient time.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso: Where can I read real Manu smriti ? Can anyone provide me the link ?
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Yam B Chand sir as far as I know Tamang haven't claim Caste system however Tamang has been influenced by Sanskritization. We are ethnic group not the caste group people. Caste are only 4 groups ho
3 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: A caste in today's society is bad thing but we still need Brahman people to continue our tradition and culture. An educated person who can teach is Brahman. Laxmi ji you are a Brahman in my view but not bahun.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso here you go http://www.hinduwebsite.com/sacredscripts/hinduism/dharma/manusmriti.asp
"Introduction to the Manusmriti the laws of Manu by George Buhler"
3 hours ago · Like · Remove Preview

Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso: Laxmi Di Jyu, is it the real one ?
3 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Yes, Hamanta bro I'm a Tamang Brahman ho
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Mitra Pariyar: Laxmi ji, what an utter nonsense. which fool said PhD upgrades my caste? Dr Ambedkar's wasnt upgraded even though he was chair of the constitution drafting committee. I dont want an upgrade either because I consider myself no less than any caste, I refuse the hierarchy. Your words suggest u firmly accept caste system and hierarchy.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso bro if you are in Nepal you can buy and read the original one but still in different Indian sites you can find it. We've to cross check with other Manusmriti as well because in some they have deleted some verses
3 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: I meant you are educating & spreading knowledge as of the time which are very relevant for us. So in true sanataan dharma you are a Brahman.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Mitra Pariyar: Its not good to argue from the perspective of one scripture or author...there are hundreds of other views bettr than this Ahuti's. Is he a moden day Rishi?
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Yam B Chand: Laxmiji, Exactly, Hinduism doesn't normally takes outsiders into Varnasram. As per our priests anyone born outside can practice Hinduism, he can't get caste, but she can be a hindu if married to a hindu.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Hehehe! Mitra Pariyar ji you are not in India and Nepal they are converting ni as author claimed not me. I'm just interpresting it. Though I didn't know anything about Manusmriti 2 years before but I always used to say to my Bahun Friends I'm a Tamang Bahun and they used to say the same thing to me Hemant Mainali bro
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Mitra Pariyar: Hemant ji, i recently read Dor Bahadur Bista's Fatalism and Development, where he says a similar thing. when Bahuns. sme, they were poor immigrants. The rulers of that time used Bahuns philosophies to keep the masses suressed - he says.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Hemant Mainali: Mitra ji, bahun are still doing the same in name of politics. They left their religion now following the politics. Religion itself was a politics of ancient time as I understand & believe. Which made rules to the society and governance .
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: To learn about your own caste Mitra Pariyar ji it is your duty to find out in depth and shared to us because as far as I know his article has been studying in Nepal by MA sociology and anthropology students. Indian scholars write up in the context of Nepal is not applicable as already stated by Yam B Chand sir for the Sanskritization of other castes/ethnicity in Nepal
3 hours ago · Like

Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso: I am really enjoying the discussion of scholars....
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Hemant Mainali ji I'm not going against Manusmriti and how I can go against it because that has taught me so many things and opened by Blocked eyds and mind regarding Caste and Gender Based Discrimination and others as well how the world has been created by Brahman who raped own daughter, Sarsawati.  I'm just against those Who love to cling those outdated verses and still blindly practicing it without rationalizing it.
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: हामी आफैमा हिनताको बोध नगरौ अरुले गर्न सक्ने काम हामी पनि गर्न सक्छौ मात्र हामीमा जाँगर र आत्मबिश्वास को खाँचो छ l सम्भावना प्रसस्तै छन् कल्पना गरेर मात्र पुग्दैन तेस्लाई पहल त गर्ने पर्छ l
3 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand: Hemantji/Mitraji, With reference to Late Dorbahadur Bista or otherwise, there are principally two types of real Brahmans in Nepal. First those real Brahmans who migrated from India and converted Malla Kings and their subjects, and second those who were before Shamanist Priests of Khas people, later converted to Hindu Bahuns. These converted Bahun's were more intelligent and also more cunning. Maharani Kausalyavati, mother of King PN Shah knew this so she secretly made Mishra Brahman, Guru for King PN Shah, so that Gorkha palace wouldn't have palace intrugues, but alas! At later time this fact was overlooked and Bahuns helped Jungbahadur to stage "Kotparva" and country went to dark era for a Century plus years and Nepali mass suffered like this.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Yesterday Bashu Dev Lohani ji shared The Lecture delivered on 26 Feb. 2011 by Nicholas Kazanas at IIT, Madras.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyN0zs_tBRY ""The collapse of Aryan Invasion Theory and the prevalence of Indigenism. (1/3)" saying " The Hindus have tried to wipe out cultural identities of many ethnic groups in the Indian subcontinent, but I don't think the so called Aryans came from outside the Indian Subcontinent. The Aryans have been wrongly portrayed as a race due to European misappropriation of Sanskrit; they think anything that is beautiful must be theirs.

Hemant Mainali: The books of any religion is like constitution of today. Which sets rules to live by & awards rights & authority. But equally it seems very inhumane & outdated which true. But some still applies and relevant. Like our patents they may be old and not energetic but they made us knowledgeable & a good person.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: It is worth going through this lecture to know the deeper understanding of Sanskritization of India. Exactly! Hemant Mainali ji. That's WHY I love Secular nation
Whether we agree or disagree it is an individual choice.

BUT I firmly believe that We are the CAUSE of our own suffering and pain because we don't want to be hurted knowing the FACTS and TRUTHS!

To STOP/END the PAIN, Suffering, Crimes and Voilence related to Caste and Gender-based discrmination those people who think, feel, believe and experience that they are suffering they themselves FIRST need to CHANGE their belief system since they are the one who knowingly and unknowingly promoting their PAIN, Suffering, and Violences because they don't want to accept the facts and hurt on their belief system.
3 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Hemant ji I do agree it was their constitution and they were benefiting certain group or community. Modern constitution benefits the entire country and human rights.
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: If human pain and suffering MUST END in this world then human being MUST STOP being too much religous because to date whatever, whereever and whenever power struggling and conflicts had taken place is directly connected with the POWER hungers POWERFUL WEAPON known as "RELIGION".

It seems as if a lot of the world's problems stem of that which is suppose to practice love and tolerance being a religious. However, througout history there has always been death, destruction and atrocities in the name of some lord "GOD" or another.

Does anyone think we will ever get to the point in society where religion is an afterthought? I am not trying to insult anyone's beliefs, but I am curious ......why believe?

I would like a more indepth analysis other than "you'd go to hell if you didn't". Appreciate any feed back......be kind! Thank you!!
3 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: All pain is gain if it stops law of universe will stop then ??????
3 hours ago · Like

Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso: According to Ambedkar, Buddhism fulfilled these requirements and so among the existing religions it was the only suitable religion for the world. He felt that the propagation of Buddhism needed a Bible. Apparently, Ambedkar wrote The Buddha and his Dhamma to fulfill this need.

In the same article, Ambedkar has enumerated the evils of Hinduism in the following manner:

1. It has deprived moral life of freedom.

2. It has only emphasized conformity to commands.

3. The laws are unjust because they are not the same for one class as of another. Besides, the code is treated as final.

According to Ambedkar, "what is called religion by Hindus is nothing but a multitude of commands and prohibitions."

In the same year, Ambedkar delivered a speech on Buddha Jayanti day in Delhi, in which he attacked Hindu gods and goddess and praised Buddhism because it was a religion based on moral principles. Besides, he pointed out, unlike the founders of other religions who considered themselves emissaries of god; the Buddha regarded himself only as a guide and gave a revolutionary meaning to the concept of religion. He said that Hinduism stood for inequality, whereas Buddhism stood for equality.
3 hours ago · Like

Phurpa Hyolmo Thhongso: "Why Dr. Ambedkar renounced Hinduism?" accessed from http://www.ambedkar.org/Babasaheb/Why.htm

Hemant Mainali: Tenzing ji, I can see Sai baba in your photo & my understanding & beliefs are similar & inspired by him. Specially uniting all religion.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Yam B Chand: Laxmiji, I personally feel that Hinduism doesn't allow conversion, rather hindus made outcastes to so many royal castes to non-Hindus for not adhering to dayly practice of hindu rituals or refusing to pay royalties? to priests, like Yadav, Jat, Gujjars, Meena and so on (these all caste were royals before, but became non hindus). To say hindus wiped out ethnic culture may not be appropriate.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: One of the lawyers (Mr. Adhikari) while I was in Nepal suggested me reading "The Manab Nyaya Shastra" since it is the first codified law of Nepal. It was written during the Malla Dynasty, which is known to be the 5th dynasty of Nepal. It was written by King Jayasthiti Malla in the 14th century along with the help of five learned Indian Brahmin persons; Kirtinath Upadhyaya Kanyakubja, Raghunath Jha Maithili, Srinath Bhatta, Mahinath Bhatta, and Ramanath Jha. The Manab Nyaya Shastra was consequently written after the study of Manu Smriti, Yagyawalkya Smriti, Mitachhyara Tika, Brihaspati Smriti, Narad Smriti and other holy texts. It was written concentrating on the practices that prevailed in the society then. The Manab Nyaya Shastra has introduced many legal provisions regarding houses, lands, castes, dead bodies etc. It was the major source of rendering justice during the medieval period. Much influence of religion can be found in the laws then. Source: Khanal Rewatiraman,Nepal ko Kanuni Itihash ko Ruprekha
And based on Manab Nyaya Shastra our Muluki Ain has been written as he said that has copied and pasted Manusmriti verses
3 hours ago · Like 1

Hemant Mainali: Yam ji, Hinduism has advanced & changed its old rules. You can find proper bahun & priest in Wales. They are proper white welsh people a whole villages is Hindu and practice and worship Kali, shiva, and all kind of temples are there.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Hip Hip! Hurray! That's WHY I'm now standing to raise voice against those verses deeply rooted from the Law of Manu that promoted discrimination even in this 21st century
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: All laws changes over the time why religious beliefs remain unchanged ?
3 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang :Hemant Mainali ji religions never ever going to unite. We've to unite ourselves. Our mind has to be unite
3 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali :Uniting in understanding mutual respect and communal tolerances. A proper secularism.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Tenzing Limbu ji it is due to FEAR of LOOSING POWER and BELIEF because that hurts our sentiment and deeply embedded belief
We've to have a faith on the Dharma of Natural Law NOT the man-made religion to control our MIND creating FEAR of HELL and HEAVEN.  Please read visit "Scientists Prove That All Religious Books Are Man-Made Nonsense" from http://www.dailysquib.co.uk/sci_tech/3102-scientists-prove-that-all-religious-books-are-man-made-nonsense.html
3 hours ago · Like · 2


Hemant Mainali: We should read about our Nepali writer mr Subba about bhayabad. Which is very inspiring and greater knowledge of understanding our society.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Yam B Chand: King Jayshiti Malla was not a Malla in reality, but a Prince of Tirhut married to sovereign Princess Rajalladevi Malla, as her father had no son. Naturally he brought all of these Brahmans from Tirhut and Mithila to design Manusmriti based 64 castes (I don't know what really this means) for Kathmandu valley. As I said Manusmriti was just misintreted at that time making 64 castes. and socondly Manusmriti was again misinterpreted when Muluki Ain of 1854, degrading every other castes than tagadharis.
3 hours ago · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: We can listen about Mr. Desh Subbha talk about FEARISM from here as well http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn8dM0c_law&feature=share
Yes, Yam B Chand sir many Newar think Jayshit Malla is a Newar but in reality he was a Chhetri from India

3 hours ago · Like · 2

Hemant Mainali: Yam ji , how did the name Nepal originated? I think it is Newari name. Cos my grands used to call Kathmandu by Nepal.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Tenzing Limbu :Our modern science is not only truth, it cannot fully prove God and belief are wrong because universe is beyond the discovery of science and understanding . Therefore, I just like to say there are many possibilities anything I do not know.
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang :Always Little Knowledge is Danger Bhan thiyo ho rahe chha ba. Am realizing know. We've been making so many mistake blaming and claiming others without knowing the facts.
Hahahahaha! God! Oh Gosh! Who is a God! Who created a God!
All human being created him and said God! We all are God ourselves
3 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Well, little knowledge can be dangerous if we use but if we realize I have little knowledge then learning part is always open.
What is the full meaning of God ?
3 hours ago · Like 2

Hemant Mainali: God is what you make of it. I believe in god itself is a suspicion of god. So nobody has found it. If god is the absolute truth what is the need to believe in. I believe in god because of the creation.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like · 1

Yam B Chand: Laxmiji, You are right. Kathmandu valley was in political turmoil at the time when Jayshiti Malla married Rajalladevi. Most of present day Newars (on FB) despise him as he gave them so many castes. It is not that Hinduism was not there in Kathmandu valley before King Jaysthiti Malla, but life was easier. There was a mix of Hinduism, Buddhism and Animism/Ghost worship, but after this new code they were virtually under Hindu priests.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Tenzing Limbu: I believe God is a powerful thing which can manifest anything it can make anything happen.\
3 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Sanskritization of Newar community cleaver Indian Bahun/Chhetri not you guys hai. I believe myself as a god since I believe in evolution and nature and natural law. So far haven't seen anything made by god. I want to live in a reality not the fantasy and illusion and dellusion created by our belief and mind though I respect others views as well since it is a matter of individual choice
3 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: I believe God is in dust to dust too. Laximi ji there are so many fantasy but we can see the action which happens but we cannot explain with our modern science.
3 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang :Hemant Mainali ji unfortunately Desh Subba book has not yet publish but he said he has address all the issues. I believe in science and spirituality not the man-made religion and God sorry hai because I believe in cause and effect relationship as per the natural law
3 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand :I also don't believe in God, but it is OK for most people to accept God's entity, as it is said empty mind is devil's workshop, and if people spend some of their spare time thinking about God, some bad thinking may be avoided, but this is only my opinion.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 2

Hemant Mainali: I only saw a bit of talk show which seemed a great knowledgeable person. As he was trying to explain Marxism in new way & betterway.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang :For those who doesn't have anything to think in their mind is good to fill with filthy and other man's ideas I suppose, which are "Bhad" and "Religions" and God
3 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu :Laximi ji I agree with you religions are all law and order of those old days
3 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: My MIND by birth is FREE so WHY I need to fill with all scraps
3 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: Yam B Chand ji plz my query about the name of our country.
3 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: I use my brain and think as per my wish as per the nature gifted qualities learning from the nature
3 hours ago ·Like

Tenzing Limbu :As long as we do not harm nobody and deprive others rights that is good.
3 hours ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Nepal is going backward and 250 years behind than developed nations like Japan, singapore, etc because people are more than unnecessariliy religious and same goes to India despite ruled by British more than 250 years they are still in STONE AGE thoughts
3 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali :Laxmi ji, what goes in your mind does not depend entirely on you. So religion is important in some respect to teach you a lot of morale of our life. A baby is baby with education and right environment becomes a great person.
3 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang : If I can learn from Nature more than what has been written in religious books then WHY I've to hooked up with religion Hemant Mainali ji.
Because realized that Religious books have been written by intelligent mind learning from the nature understanding the POWER of FEMININE because by birth FEMINE is equal as Maculine in MIND not the body hai.
Thanks everyone within a hour we've very productive discussions on the topic starting from Plato qutoe 'Wine" and end up with Religion and God!
Hehehehe! while having discussion with you guys I was also having a chat with Desh Subba about his write up on "FEARISM"
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Hemant Mainali: Laxmi ji, you might find me funny but it is important to have some religion in life as it is the source of our human life & culture. Which sets a proper rule of morale values, marriage values & relationship value. So I do not follow religion to please god but practice to better my life.
Say hello from my side to desh subba people like him can bring greater change than politicians.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like 1

Tenzing Limbu: आध्यात्मिक चिन्तन जीवन थाकेको बेला बिसाउने चौतारी हो
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang :Hemant Mainali ji I'm a non-religious person but respect all good verses of all religions but don't hooked up doing rituals based on religious norms. From the very childhood I was skeptical with religions and always had question is religion is for Rich and Male. Otherwise WHY poor can't afford to go to Temples and Why women are not priests
Tenzing Limbu ji आध्यात्मिक and Dharmic (Religious) are two different things ho and I LOVE the आध्यात्मिक part NOT the religion.
2 hours ago · Like 1

Tenzing Limbu :When time comes we will understand the spiritual value
2 hours ago · Unlike · 2

Yam B Chand: OMG! Laxmiji, I was not saying about you and me, we both are non-believer in God. I was saying about people who want to believe in God, which means they at least do something when they think about God and spend their spare time. You and me have so many things to keep us busy all the time.
2 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang :Oh na hau Yam B Chand sir what I said that made you to "OMG"
2 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: I am not religious but I love spiritual discovery .
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Hemant Mainali: Laxmi ji, if I call you Didi it is because of religion not because of my own belief. The human life is definitely attached to religious belief but we need to amend things as time progresses.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Tenzing Limbu ji same me too
2 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand: Good verses as well principles of almost all religions are very attractive, but if you go deep, I think, all preach the same thing, fight for your religion, because yours is the supreme.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 3

Tenzing Limbu: Religions are the groups of political parties.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Anyway, I love philogophical thoughts based on the nature and natural law and that is my religion not the made by men such as Buddhism, Hinduism, Christinanity, Islamic, Jewish, etc. Religions are made by POWER hungers to GENERATE FEAR among HUMAN being
2 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: All religions are based on some truth but more law and order.
2 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: Spiritual belief is advanced belief & progression of religion. Where all corrupt beliefs are erased and but more purer.
2 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: Cool Desh Subbha ji just shared his bolg http://www.fearism.blogspot.com




Tenzing Limbu There are many told and untold spiritual discoveries which is very independent and interesting. Tenzing Limbu ji "All religions are based on some truth but more law and order." It is not 100% true hai
2 hours ago · Like · 2

Heman Mainali: I think we need religion for our family rules and morale discipline. But spiritual is ultimate.
2 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang :Desh Subba ji said "You can see three books in the fesrism, many articles, kantipur daily, annapurna post daily, kantopur fm, bijayapur fm interviiew, other people has written many articles, only main book of fearism not publish. It will publish soon. now it is in sikkim university master degree course"
I love Spirituality and We generally mix up Spirituality and Religion which are different in reality but we are living in Fantasy and illusion and dellusion so thought they are same
Hemant Mainali ji Religion is to control ignorant and innocent mind ho. In Japan they don't have religion and my youngest sister-in-law is a Japanese ho to whom am I living here in Sydney
2 hours ago ·  Like · 2

Tenzing Limbu: As Hemant ji mentioned religion is only for moral and discipline family but we can enjoy on spiritual meditation.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Hemant Mainali ji that moral (religion) is making our girls and dalit inhumane in India and Nepal
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Hemant Mainali: When I say something that is of my understanding but when I experience something new my belief may change. So far I believe religion is important to discipline our life. Where as spiritual is to let go and enjoy the eternal. I think.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Hemant ji not bad idea I liked it ha ha ha
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: In terms of development and evolution WHY India and Nepal being so much religious countreis can't produce great mind people who influence world thoughts and challenge their belief in a positive way except Buddha. I don't compare Gandhi because he studied in UK.
2 hours ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Because of notorious Manu's theory I guess.
2 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand: Howabout Rabindra Tagore who refused Nobel Prize for Litreture, just because whites were ruling his country.
2 hours ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: It is so funny I've to Indian facebook friends one is a businessman and Manisha Koirala very close friend who knows detail about Islamic verses/allah being a Hindu and another one who is a Muslim knows every things about Hindu and Hindu gods. They don't debate among each other because they realized that they'll be both can't win due to the weaknesses in their religions. And I'm learning from both and now that my Hindu friend realized he has to do something for Humanity-Girls trafficking
2 hours ago · Like · 1


Laxmi Tamang: They are very hot in their arguments but Umesh ji Failed in his discussions
2 hours ago · Like

Yam B Chand: Hemantaji, I am not sure about the origin of the name Nepal. Those believing Ne Muni say it is because of his name, but some say due to people Newars or Nairs, but there is no similarity between Keralite Nairs and our Newars. Newars sometimes say they are from Tibet and yet some others say they came from India. Buddhists say Valley was drained of water by Manjushree and Hindus say it was done by Lord Krishna with his Sudarshan Chakra. I am so confused.
2 hours ago · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang Yam B Chand sir confusion is a starting point towards wisdom ho because we search for reasons and answers which is great
Anyway, I took the advantage from them because I used to say NO OPINION Please only facts, figures and evidences based on what we have and it also helped me to discuss about topic of my research as well as country issues that we've
2 hours ago · Edited · Like

Hemant Mainali: So laxmi ji, how much your religion plays a part in your life? Do you conduct your life to some extent as of your religion or not?
2 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: I strongly believe if Nepal can be made as a SPIRITUAL naton rather than HINDU nation We can be one of the best nation in terms of moral conduct and prosperity in the world
Religion doesn't play a single part in my life because I'm not a religious person. I used to distance my self from Lama guru and their religous ceremoniies at home or else always because I used to ask Question to them but they didn't answer my concern satisfactorily and I don't go to Mandir to worship. However, as a fun and tourist I go with my friends and mum sometime to give them accompany that's it
2 hours ago · Like 1

Hemant Mainali: I agree with you laxmi ji, in ancient time Nepal was a spiritual place for sages and gods. Many rishi Maharishi have used Nepal as their spiritual meditating place.
So if a baby is born or marriage ceremony and such events how are these conducted?
2 hours ago via mobile · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Spiritual person respects ALL religions BUT religious person they don't respect and accept all religions
Hemant Mainali ji in my family we don't do any such rituals. We are very progressive family. All 3 brothers married in their own ways and had their kids without Lamas gurus name giving. My mum aged 76 counts bid that's it we don't do yearly rituals as well. However, dad funeral had done with Lama from Tibetan and he was very progressive as well. Told my brothers if you can abstain from Water then don't eat salt because salt is the produce of ocean/sea (water). He suugested to us if you killed your Aatma then no good so if you feel like eating something you can eat no need to refrain. He also told us not to cry because for the death person Spirit to travel our TEARS will be like a Strome on its path because after death Spiriti is so ferzile and will creaate problem to go to heaven as he said so we didn't cry except sobbing.
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Yam B Chand: Yes Laxmiji, I can understand by your name, and you said your dad was in British army. I am a four generation Gorkha soldier and I have no different family background than most janjaati commenters here, but they think I am one of the ruling elite. My forefathers became Lahore for survival, as the whole country was Rana Oligarchy and who didn't suffer during those dark days?
2 hours ago · Unlike · 1

Hemant Mainali: Laxmi ji, religion is important for those reasons to keep the tradition and close family members in some order of respect & discipline. I totally respect your progressive life and not follow exactly of religious views. But like I said religion is important for disciplined life and keep the tradition of family and culture. Does not mean we can not be progressive and leave orthodox values.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Hemant Mainali ji then WHAT do you think about Japan because Japanese people have much good moral and had great (disciplined) culture than any other people in the world. It depends upon individual how religious they are to answer your questions.
2 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: Well I can not speak about Japanese because I have no knowledge of them. But they do have religion,don't they? Japan is very rich culturally I guess. What is their cultural values based on?
2 hours ago via mobile · Like

Yam B Chand: I think Japanese people also believe in Buddhist and Shinto culture. Foremost they believe in discipline, hardwork and patriotism. They also believe in seppeku and harakiri, which means they commit suicide if they fail their nation or their mission.
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Japanese are not religious people as far as I know that's why they respect all religions. However, they have influenced of both Buddhism and Christinanity. I believe on Cause and Effect relationship rather than Myths. So, I don't blindly follow and bel...See More
2 hours ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: Yes I heard suicide is a major social issues in Japan as well as self harm. But I kind of believe a culture evolves from religious values. I think religion does not have to big and popular for cultural advancement. Japan's hard working and committed to it's mission culture got to be something to do with it's marshal art and warrior belief of ancient religion/culture.
2 hours ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Suicide is a major problems of Japanese youths due to high competition. Has nothing to do with religion because in Nepal also suicide is in increasing trend. While talking about any issues we've to think holistically not in a sterotype way with our predetermined mindset. We've to be a FREE thinker to fully utilize our mind function
2 hours ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: Because of lack of spiritual practice.
Spiritual practice is the platform can help realise the reality and live with happiness,
about an hour ago · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: Exactly! Spirtual practice such as Meditation only can calm down our mind that creates happiness and satisfaction and peace in mind
We ususally say Today I've a Peace of Mind when we are satisfy
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Hemant Mainali: But how does a spiritual value originate? Such meditation and spiritual value evolved through Buddhism & Hinduism. I think.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Creates hope and value of life
Meditation comes from anything we trust.
about an hour ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: As far as I know Siddhartha Gautam being a King son from Chhetri clan got all the knoweldge of Veda from Brahmin thus went to search the answers for human pain and suffering and tried each and every means as said in Veda and else holy scriptures but couldn't find answers. Thus decided to go for Meditation and got the wisdom and answers of pain and suffering. This meditation is called Vipassana and western world and pyschologist named it "Mindfulness"
about an hour ago · Like · 1

I learned about Mindfulness here at the University with psychologist so funny
about an hour ago · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Buddha he learnt by pain and suffering while did his meditation (deep research) and he realized the theory of " Realize the reality and live with happiness"
about an hour ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: Yes but how did meditation come to be popular and successful. Because it was taught by Hindu religion budhhist religion. So spirituality in religion must happen which means a purer form of religion. To think of inner soul itself is finding peace & happiness.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Tenzing Limbu: Religion they used part of spirituality to engage the people in religion.
about an hour ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Heheehe! Hemant Mainali ji your MIND has been preoccupied by religion. Your mind is not FREE hai
Nepal has to make a spiritual world rather than religous hub because spiritual attracts everyone and religion distance everyone
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Hemant Mainali: Why is Dalai Lama not wanting to be like a politician? Because he is a spiritual guru & his way of ruling is by religion. Which seems very good so far no discrimination as I heard.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Tenzing Limbu: If you contemplate history of spirituality all sages they meditated in Nepal from Vedic time.
about an hour ago · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: Hemant Mainali ji as far as I know in Hindu they talk about soul but in Buddhism they talk about Spirit
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: Soul and spirit they are two words but they are same .
about an hour ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Hemant Mainali ji Dalai Lama is not a spiritual leader though people say. In reality he is a politician and a King of Tibet and religous leader thus used Buddha philosophy as a Weapon to fight against China luring the ignorant mind of th world.
about an hour ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: In the history almost all kings used Religions as a WEAPON to fool, bull and rule over innocent and ignorant mass because reason can wash people mind so easily creating FEAR of HELL and HEAVEN
about an hour ago · Edited · Like

Tenzing Limbu: In fact I agree with Laximi ji
about an hour ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: I am not talking about Hinduism but all religion. I have strong belief in religion because all religion teaches to be good and humane. But we must keep our religion practicing to keep our values intact. If we give up religion all together it is not going to do good. A gradual change must come but life without religious values may not be a good thing. This applies to all religion.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: I don't have any faith on Dalai Lama because he lied about Buddha birth place to cheer up India where he is living as a refugee. However, I admire his wisdom
Spiritual people they never ever lie and speak the truth based on the available facts and natural law without any FEAR without manipulating ignorant mind to fool, bull and rule over them. They are not greedy and selifish
about an hour ago · Like 1

Hemant Mainali: Spiritual people become spiritual because of what laxmi ji? A religion plays a vital role to make one spiritual.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: Laximi ji I just want to share my experience about Dalai Lama miracle happened with me numbers of years ago. One day I was driving in busiest high way in Canada suddenly I was blacked out and I could not see anything suddenly "Om mane padme hum" it came out from my mouth and I have seen vision of Dalai Lama out of blue and after sometime my vision came back. Those days I had sickness of dizziness it just use to pop out without knowingly. Since that incident I do not have that sickness and I consider him one of my guru.
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: Free minds without any prejudice trying to understand truths for humanity and peace learning from the natural laws praticing mental calmness exercise i.e. meditation make them spiritual I suppose. Hemant Mainali ji try to find out in Sanatan Dharma most of the verses you can see written based on the natural law. Tell me how made natural law and who made religions
about an hour ago · Edited · Like · 1

Hemant Mainali: A free mind is important to be spiritual. The way I understand is religion is a seed &spiritual is a fruit. If you don't have a religion to be based on there is no spirituality. I think.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: After 1000 years people might consider Dalai Lama as a God like people consider Buddha as a God though Buddha said he was not a God but an awaken person
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: We are so use to base religion with spirituality therefore it may take us time to free our mind from our daily practice.  Buddha is considered a God because of his good did I guess.
I am not Buddhist and my religion is universal I do respect good things in all religions and I do not have any obligation in any religion but my incident with Dalai Lama is something miracle to me.
about an hour ago · Unlike · 2

Laxmi Tamang: It is just the other way around ho Hemant Mainali bro. To understand and learn about spirituality is not an easy task because it is the path of Truth to understand and founds fantasy thus many people don't like to talk about spirituality. However to talk about the religion is like an opium as said by Karl Marx because people are mostly neurotic in their attitude and behavour love to follow easy path because everything has been ready made.
I'm not a religious nor I'm a Buddhist. I'm learning to be a Free thinker that's it because I love learning and understanding the reality
about an hour ago · Edited · Like · 2

Hemant Mainali: Laxmi ji, is being spiritual means what?
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Tenzing Limbu ji it is due to his positive vibe that's attracted your mind
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: Hemant ji spirituality means ease the stress of life by understanding truth and remain happy.
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Laxmi Tamang: True spiritual people in any cost can't be Negative and Can refrain self from any luxury of modern world. However religious gurus they can't thus we frequently hear their attitude and behavior connected with SEX and Sexual scandals. Religious gurus are after MONEY and CROWD but spiritual leaders are after peace and satifaction and happiness of all. I hope you know the Law of Attraction based on the natural law Tenzing Limbu ji.
about an hour ago · Like 1

Tenzing Limbu: My truth with Dalai Lama was I was never impressed before this incident.
about an hour ago · Like

Hemant Mainali: Yes to be such spiritual person the knowledge & wisdom must be based on religion. If there was no religion & godly value . Spirituality would not exist. I may be wrong but my poor belief.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: My belief in spirituality consist of all universal actions therefore, how a spiritual person can stay away from the physical reality ?
about an hour ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: Hemant Mainali bro, Umesh ji sanga mit lagaudha hunchha hai because you couldn't free your mind despite being an educated man knowing about many issues. We've to learn to make our mind like of a Child (free mind) only then we can pour anything in our brain/head. Spirituality is a highest form of self (mental state/mind) awakening of human being ho so hardly very few people are spiritual in this world.
about an hour ago · Edited · Like · 2

Hemant Mainali: Yes laxmi ji, hence I am questioning like a child. I want to learn & being a Hindu follower it's difficult probably.
about an hour ago via mobile · Like

Laxmi Tamang: All religious gurus, monks, nuns, priests, etc are not spiritually awaken and mostly they are involve in religious politics.
Have you ever heard of Spiritual politics but we heard and read about religious politics. Religion is all about POWER and POLITICS to control mass and their mind as per the interest of the state and ruling mentality people
about an hour ago · Edited · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: Many may be involved unknowingly with blind faith too.
Spirituality is the wisdom and people may use that for their any means of benefit.
about an hour ago · Unlike · 1

Laxmi Tamang: I've one of my friends who is doing a PhD Ms. Kafle at Banaras Hindu University and I learned a lot from her as well about spirituality. She is completely against religion and related rituals but am not like that.
about an hour ago · Like · 1

Tenzing Limbu: well, it depends on individual we all are not in same plane
about an hour ago · Like

Laxmi Tamang: The incidents of crimes related to SEX, Drugs, Alcohol, etc can be controlled massively if we teach our children from schools about spirituality rather than from home to become a religious and Nepal can give a good education to the world I suppose. We'll have peace and prosperity in a diverse settings
59 minutes ago · Edited · Like

Tenzing Limbu: If we try it might work.
about an hour ago · Like