भोटे शब्दको रुपक (metaphorical) संज्ञात्मक नै खतरा: मानवशास्त्रीय तथा समाजशास्त्रीय दृष्टिकोणद्वारा विश्लेषण

चिम्सो आँखा थेप्चो नाक हुने भोटेहरुको जे पनि खतरा नै हुने रहेछ तथ्यगत विश्लेषण गर्दा | 

लहै विचारविमर्श गर्नुहोस्, जान्नुहोस बुझ्नुहोस् सबै परिवर्तन गर्नुहोस् श्रीमती र आफ्नो सन्तान बाहेक भनि सल्लाह सुझाव दिएको चिम्सो आँखा थेप्चो नाक भएको कोरियन धनाढ्य व्यापारी भोटे, ली कुन्-हे ले जो स्यामसुङ्ग कम्पनीको अध्यक्ष पनि थिए अहिले चाही यस धर्तिबाट विदा भई सकेका रहेछन गतसाल नै |

नेपाली खस आर्य र नेवारहरुले नेपालमा त्यस्तै भोटेको रुपक (metaphorical) संज्ञात्मक रुपमा गुणगान गाएका होइनन् रहेछ निम्नानुसार |

• भोटे ताल्चा बलियो ताल्चा, 
• भोटे (भालु) कुकुर ठुलो डरलाग्दो रिसाह प्रवृतिको तर नभुकी टोक्ने, 
• भोटेको बच्चा स्वस्थ बलियो रातो पुक्क परेको गाला, 
• भोटे ग्लास ठुलो ग्लास, 
• भोटे नुहुवाई-धेरै समय लगाएर भित्रि बाहिरी शुद्ध सफा हुने गरी मिची मिची फोहोर मैला फ्याक्ने, 
• भोटे कोशी-भोट (तिब्बत) मा मुहान भएको नदि भोटे कोशी र भोटेकोशी गाउँपालिका सिन्धुपाल्चोक जिल्लाको पनि खतरा नै मान्दा ठान्दा रहेछन |

त्यसै उच्च हिमाल क्षेत्र भोट (तिब्बत) अवस्थित कैलाश पर्वत मान्सरोभर भोटे शिव जी को लिङ्ग पुज्ने र मान्ने प्रचलन, प्रथा र परम्परा स्थापना गरेका होइनन् रहेछ हिन्दुस्तानको सप्त ऋषिमुनिहरुको सन्तानले शिव पुराण नै रचेर सोचेर लेखेर | 

ब्रह्म पुत्र नदि पनि भोटमै रहेछ मुहान | 

निश्चित रुपमा ब्रह्म ज्ञान पनि भोटेबाटै प्राप्त भएको हुनु पर्छ भन्नेमा कुनै शंका उपशंका छैन |

तर तथ्य गहन, गहिरो र गम्भीर रुपमा सोच खोज् गर्नु पर्ने हुन्छ मौखिक कथ्य जुन लिप्पीबद्ध गरेको पाइन्छ साहित्यक रुपमा सोलाई सहि सत्य र यथार्थ रुपमा पुष्टि गर्न जसरी उल्लेखित तथ्यगत नेपाली समाजको समसामयिक विषयवस्तुहरुको घटना परिघटना, बोलि वचन र व्यवहारहरुको विचारविमर्श विवेचना र विश्लेषण र संश्लेषणद्वारा पुष्टि हुन्छ भोटेको रुपक (Metaphorical) अर्थ के हो भनि नेपाली समाजमा | गोरा जातिहरुले चाही श्रीमती कति चाडै र धेरै फेर्ने गर्छन | 

नपत्याए हेर्नुहोस् त पश्चिमा मुलुकहरुमा पारिवारिक सामाजिक बनोटको संरचना कस्तो पाउनु हुन्छ | बच्चाहरु पनि धर्म पुत्र र धर्म पुत्रीको नाममा लिने प्रचलन छ आफ्नो सन्तान हुँदा हुँदै त्यसरी धर्म पुत्र, धर्म पुत्री बनाउनुको अर्थ के हो? तर भोटेहरुले हतपत श्रीमती फेर्ने गर्दैनन् रहेछ भनि उनीहरुको विगतदेखि वर्तमानलाई गहन, गहिरो र गम्भीर रुपमा सोध खोज गरेमा स्पष्ट हुन्छ | त्यसैले भोटेहरुको ३-४ जना दाजुभाईको एक श्रीमती हुने प्रचलन, प्रथा र परम्परा स्थापना गरेका होइनन् जुन हिन्दुस्तानी पाँच पाण्डव दाजुभाईले पनि सिको गर्दा उनीहरुको राज्यसत्ता नै स्वाहा भयो | 

अरुको नक्कल के गर्ने नगर्ने होस् पनि जान्नु बुझ्नु पर्छ है गहन, गहिरो र गम्भीर रुपमा मानवशास्त्रीय र समाजशास्त्रीय गहन, गहिरो र गम्भीर रुपमा सोच खोज गर्दै विश्लेषण र संश्लेषण गर्नु पर्छ देश, काल र परिस्थिति अनुसार चलन सिक्नु जान्नु बुझ्नु पर्छ तब पो सफल भइन्छ जीवन र जगतमा मानवताको लागि | 😁😁😁

Social science theory are not universally applicable as asserted by Mao Zedong

In my understanding based on my own analysis theory of Marx, Engles, Lenin and Stalin are perfectly applicable only to those time, place and context when (19th and 20th centuries) and where (Europe) it was coined since it was NOT the natural science (physics, chemistry and biology) related theories. Their theories were social science related theories that changes over the time and human brain development and advancement as according to the natural science (evolution, revolution and devolution). 

Whatever Mao Zedong asserted and claimed was perfectly alright because he was 20th century great community leader of China. 

We are in 21st century where due to natural science advancement even social science has also been moving forward rather than remain in the status quo like people mindset remain as it is because of the dogmatic sociopolitical theological related theories. 

In Nepal and India we have layers of discrimination based on colour, class, caste, creed, and cult as well as biological sex and social construction of sex called Gender. However, in the western world and China, people have not faced and experienced discrimination like we do in India and Nepal. This is the reason WHY western world theories of Marx, Engles, Lenin and Stalin are not applicable all in one. However, it is applicable partly. 

I love learning all types of theories but social science related theories I don't find useful in our day to day life because it is not applicable in changing time, place and social context. However, as asserted and claimed by Mao Zedong, a Chinese communist revolutionary who was the founder of the People's Republic of China, which he ruled as the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party from its establishment in 1949 it is not complete true but definitely it is partially true. He said, "The theory of Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin is universally applicable. We should regard it not as a dogma, but as a guide to action. Studying it is not merely a matter of learning terms and phrases but of learning Marxism-Leninism as the science of revolution. It is not just a matter of understanding the general laws derived by Marx, Engels, Lenin and Stalin from their extensive study of real life and revolutionary experience, but of studying their standpoint and method in examining and solving problems." (Source: "The Role of the Chinese Communist Party in the National War" (October 1938), Selected Works, Vol. II, pp. 208-09) 

I find fascinating to learn and explore how people think and understand different issues from their own perception, level of consciousness, understanding and information and knowledge that they hold inside their brain. Most of the people talk about science without truly knowing what is science. 

Usually Nepalese people think science is physics, chemistry and biology subjects. However, to learn and understand science first of all conscience is utmost important. If individual doesn't have conscience in their head it would be wise NOT to talk about science suffering from own sensory organs created illusion and delusion to spread rumors, myths and false information believing and clinging on fictional literature related knowledge and information. Even well educated professionals think that theories are science. 

In fact, NOT theories are scientifically true and universal only those that are based on natural science. Social theories such as Marxism, Leninism, Feminism, and so forth can't be considered universal. But dogmatic people who can't think differently other than their loved dogma (ideological belief) whether that be theological dogma or sociopolitical dogma think and believe that whatever applicable in one time, place and social context is equally applicable in another time, place and social context. This is false belief and understanding of those people who can't think beyond their ideological dogma that has been swallowed without digestion thus love to be nauseated among others as well.

One of the facebookers in my above status pointed out quoting from the statement of Mao Zedong "but guide to action". 

In response to him stating, "All socio-political-economic ideological belief that are considered social science theory/ies are no doubt is a Dogma whether its followers think and believe it is guide to action or not. 

Have a look in Nepal or even elsewhere hardly anyone want to change their way of thinking from different thoughts, ideas, ideological belief, theories, or else. Everyone thinks my way is highway and others are shit. This proves how dogmatic people are who cling on one set of principles or theory rather than strive to be a pragmatic adopting each and every bit of good from different thoughts, ideas, ideological belief or theories."

Beef eating is the oldest tradition of ancient India: Available textual evidence suggests

In Nepal, mainly Tamang community and as per Hindu belief system so-called untouchable caste group Sarki (type of Dalit people) people have been eating beef even as of now but priestly caste group Hindu people who make policy of the country and society think and believe Hindu never ever has eaten beef which is completely wrong perception that they have been holding in their mind if we dig out the history all the misconception related to their false belief will be cleared out. However, they don't do so so keep criticizing Tamang people thinking they are lower caste just because they eat their mother "cow" meeting. To learn and understand about colour, class, caste, creed and cult based discrimination in Nepal I have been exploring ancient Hindu texts and scriptures written by different Indian scholars and it has proven that in ancient India Brahmin who consider self while skinned colour pure and superior human beings used to eat beef. For example, Mr. Jeevan Paudel in the ARN facebook Group dated 8 March 2021 posted below status that clearly illustrate how beef lovers were ancient Indian Brahmin.

"Manusmriti (Chapter 5 / Verse 30) says, “It is not sinful to eat meat of eatable animals, for Brahma has created both the eaters and the eatables.”

Maharishi Yagyavalkya says in Shatpath Brahmin (3/1/2/21) that, “I eat beef because it is very soft and delicious.”

Apastamb Grihsutram (1/3/10) says, “The cow should be slaughtered on the arrival of a guest, on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ of ancestors and on the occasion of a marriage.”

Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.” Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.”

Vashistha Dharmasutra (11/34) writes, “If a Brahmin refuses to eat the meat offered to him on the occasion of ‘Shraddha’ or worship, he goes to hell.” Hinduism’s greatest propagator (The Complete Works of Swami Vivekanand, vol.3, p. 536).

Adi Shankaracharya’ commentary on Brihdaranyakopanishad 6/4/18 says : ‘Odan’ (rice) mixed with meat is called ‘Mansodan’. On being asked whose meat it should be, he answers ‘Uksha’. ‘Uksha’ is used for an ox, which is capable to produce semen.

The book ‘The History and Culture of the Indian People’, published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan, Bombay and edited by renowned historian R.C.Majumdar (Vol.2, page 578) says: “This is said in the Mahabharat that King Rantidev used to kill two thousand other animals in addition to two thousand cows daily in order to give their meat in charity”.

Eating the meat of cow is not a sin in hinduism🤣🤣 "